spatial deixis in kurdish: a cognitive-pragmatic approach

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Graduate Student of Linguistics, University of Kurdistan, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Linguistics, University of Kurdistan, Iran

Abstract

in this article after introducing different deixis, we analyze Kurdish deixis through cognitive semantics. the main focus of the paper is on demonstrative and spatial adverbs among various elements which function as deixis. through this paper we show that the in third person singular pronouns in Kurdish the concept of distance is encoded. far distance encoding is done via the demonstrative /ʔɐw/ if only it is in contrast to the demonstrative /ʔɐm/ in such away that these two are in contrast to each other in an utterance or to be in a question and its answer by the speaker and audience. the only exception is where the speaker is in the figure insead of the ground. distance encoding in four main deixis /ɐmɐ/، /ʔɐwɐ/،/ʔɐmɑnɐ/،/ʔɐwɑnɐ/ are influenced by their derivation of third person singular pronoun and their encoding is the same as the third person singular pronoun. the meaning and range, refered by spatial deixis /ʔɐenɐ/ and /ʔɐeɾɐ/ is not recognized exactly and results in ambiguity which causes a relativity in the boundary. so the boundary intended by the speaker is not exactly what the audience understand and is conveyed via the situation context. furthermore, the speaker's figure when using spatial deixis and the relationship between spatial deixis and motion verbs are probed.

Keywords


منابع
فارسی: علائی، بهلول (۱۳۹۴). معنی شناسی عبارات اشاری: معرفی انگارهای شناختی-گفتمانی». پژوهش های زبانی، ۹ (۲)، ۸۱-۹۹
فرخنده، پروانه (۱۳۸۰). «اینجا و آنجا، هرجا: اشاری های مکان در زبان فارسی». زبانشناسی،
.۵۱-۳۵ ،(۲) 16
منفرد، نرجس و اعظم استاجی (۱۳۹۰). بررسی و توصیف چگونگی کاربرد و ادراک صورت های اشاری در نابینایان فارسی زبان زبان پژوهی، ۳ (۵)، ۲۴۰۱.
انگلیسی
Anderson, S. R., & Keenan, E. L. (1985). "Deixis". Language typology and syntactic description. 3, 259-308.
Büler, K. ([1934] 1965). Sprachtheorie. Die Dastellungsfunktion der Sprachen.
Chapman, S. (2011). Pragmatics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cruse, A. (2006). A glossary of semantics and pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
Diessel, H. (1999). Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization Vol. 42). John Benjamins Publishing.
Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fillmore, C. J. (1971b). Toward a theory of deixis. Paper delivered to the Pacific conference on contrastive linguistics and language universals. University of Hawaii.
 (1977). --- Topics in lexical semantics. Current issues in linguistic theory, 76, 138. Himmelmann, N. P. 1996. Demonstratives in narrative discourse: a taxonomy of universal uses. Studies in Anaphora, 205-254.
Imai, S. (2003). Spatial Deixis. Retrieved March 24, 2006.
Kryk, B. (1990). Deixis-a pragmatic universal?. Toward a Typology of European Languages.
Lakoff, G. (1988). Cognitive semantics. Meaning and mental representations. 119, 154.
Langacker, R, & Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. OUP USA.
Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive linguistics: An introduction (Vol. 13). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge textbooks in linguistics. Cambridge/New York.
 (1997). --- Language and cognition: The cognitive consequences of spatial
description in Guugu Yimithirr. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology. 71), 98131.
(2003). ---Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity (Vol. 5). Cambridge University Press.
 (2004). --- Deixis. In The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 97-121). Blackwell.
Lyons, J. (1977). Deixis, space and time. Semantics 2, 636-724. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Najmaddin, Sh. M.,& Hwsein, R.M. (2017). A Contrastive Study of Demonstratives in Kurdish and English. Journal of Humanities And Social Science, 2210), 46-52.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics: Oxford University Press.